The most important terminology in the whole article is competency. Antonacopoulou and Louise are categorical that each person has unique virtues that contribute towards competency When individuals interact in social settings, these virtues can be recognized quite easily. The authors note that competency should not be limited to certain skills and knowledge. Better still, the demonstrated behaviors and the anticipated standards of performance are not adequate to define competency.
However, emotions, perceptions and attitudes are fundamental in the definition of competency as stated by Antonacopoulou and Louise This is a broad way of exploring the element of competency. The definition is acceptable in understand its precise meaning. Another critical terminology in the paper is the competency framework. In other words, a competent manager is always sought by organizations.
Therefore, the competency framework provides the best approach for enhancing management development in this dynamic business world. In order to support their assertions, the authors have used various sources of information. Evidence has been provided from the past research activities through a long list of references. Moreover, the arguments presented by the authors also support the main points in the article.
- Reframing Organizations, the Symbolic Frame Essay Example.
- master thesis university of pretoria;
- Bibliography - Reframing Organizations - Wiley Online Library.
- How to cite this page.
- The Reframing Organizations Essay.
- good graduate school admission essays;
For instance, the competency framework has been applied when searching a competent manager. As already mentioned, business managers are the main intended audiences for this text. It is obvious that the information contained in the article is relevant and most suitable for this group of individuals. They require such type of information so that they can learn how to become competent as managers. Besides, the authors have put forward a critique section in the article that explores management development in terms of opposing competency theories.
For example, managerial roles can be standardized using the universalism approach or theory. Opposing and supporting views from other authors have also been summarized in the text. These provide a solid ground through which the audience can make their final judgments since the authors are objective throughout the text.
On the other hand, there are quite a number of weaknesses that have been spotted in the article. Although there are words and sentences that evoke strong responses while reading through the article, the authors have failed to support such assertions with strong empirical evidence. About half of American survey respondents, for example, selected "don't know" rather than "none," "hundreds," "thousands," or "millions" when asked the estimated number of current and future i.
An earlier survey of Americans [ 10 ] demonstrated that most people see climate change as a geographically and temporally distant threat to the non-human environment. Notably, not a single survey respondent freely associated climate change as representing a threat to people. Similarly, few Canadians, without prompting, can name any specific human health threat linked to climate change impacts in their country [ 8 ]. Cognitive research over the past several decades has shown that how people "frame" an issue - i. The polling data cited above [ 7 — 9 ] suggests that the dominant mental frame used by most members of the public to organize their conceptions about climate change is that of "climate change as an environmental problem.
This focus is also susceptible to a dominant counter frame that the best solution is to continue to grow the economy - paying for adaptive measures in the future when, theoretically, society will be wealthier and better able to afford them - rather than focus on the root causes of the environmental problem [ 13 ]. This economic frame likely leaves the public ambivalent about policy action and works to the advantage of industries that are reluctant to reduce their carbon intensity.
Indeed, it is precisely the lack of a countervailing populist movement on climate change that has made policy solutions so difficult to enact [ 13 , 14 ].
Significant efforts have been made over the past several years by public health organizations to raise awareness of the public health implications of climate change and prepare the public health workforce to respond, although as noted above, it is not clear the extent to which public health professionals, journalists, or most importantly, the public and policy makers have taken notice. In the United States, National Public Health Week was themed "Climate Change: Our Health in the Balance," the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention created a Climate Change and Public Health program, and several professional associations assessed the public health system's readiness to respond to the emerging threat [ 15 — 17 ].
Globally, World Health Day was themed "Protecting Health from Climate Change," and the World Health Organization has developed a climate change and health work plan, the first objective of which is "raising awareness of the effects of climate change on health, in order to prompt action for public health measures" [ 18 ]. Several prominent medical journals have released special issues on climate change and health [ 19 — 21 ], and these and other medical journals [ 4 ] have issued strongly worded editorials urging health professionals to give voice to the health implications of climate change.
An important assumption in these calls to action is that there may be considerable value in introducing a public health frame into the ongoing public - and policy - dialogue about climate change. While there is indeed solid theoretical basis for this assumption, to the best of our knowledge there is not yet empirical evidence to support the validity of the assumption [ 22 ].
The purpose of this study therefore was to explore how American adults respond to an essay about climate change framed as a public health issue.
Reframing, Bolman And Deal Essay
Our hypothesis was that a public health-framed explanation of climate change would be perceived as useful and personally relevant by readers, with the exception of members of one small segment of Americans who dismiss the notion that human-induced climate change is happening.
We used two dependent measures in this hypothesis: a composite score based on respondent reactions to each sentence in the essay, and the overall valence of respondents' general comments made after reading the essay. Our study builds on previous research that identified six distinct segments of Americans, termed Global Warming's Six Americas [ 7 ]. The four segments in the middle of the continuum are likely to benefit most from a reframing of climate change as a human health problem because, to a greater or lesser degree, they are not yet sure that they fully understand the issue and are still, if motivated to do so, relatively open to learning about new perspectives.
Global Warming's Six Americas. A nationally representative sample of American adults classified into six unique audience segments based on their climate change-related beliefs, behaviors and policy preferences. Between May and August , 74 adults were recruited to participate in semi-structured in-depth elicitation interviews that lasted an average of 43 minutes ranging from 16 to minutes and included the presentation of a public health framed essay on climate change. The recruitment process was designed to yield completed interviews with a demographically and geographically diverse group of at least 10 people from each of the previously identified "Six Americas" [ 7 ].
Four respondents were dropped from this study due to incomplete data, leaving a sample size of Audience segment status i. To achieve demographic diversity in the sample, we recruited an approximately balanced number of men and women, and an approximately balanced number of younger 18 to 30 , middle-aged 31 to 50 , and older 51 and older adults see Table 1. To achieve geographic diversity, we recruited participants in one of two ways. Capitol, the Smithsonian Museum buildings, and the Lincoln Memorial ; and shoppers were interviewed at an "outlet" mall i.
The outlet mall is more than an hour driving distance outside of Washington, DC and attracts shoppers from Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, as well as visitors from further away who are driving the interstate freeway. The remaining study participants were recruited via email from among participants to a nationally representative survey that we conducted in Fall [ 7 ].
They were interviewed subsequently by telephone, after being mailed a copy of the test "public health essay" - described below - in a sealed envelope marked "do not open until asked to do so by the interviewer. George Mason University Human Subjects Review Board provided approval for the study protocol reference ; all potential respondents received written consent information prior to participation.
The 70 study participants resided in 29 states. Using U. In , the geographic distribution of the overall U.
Business leader of the twelvemonth: Alan Bollard
The majority of the interview was devoted to open-ended questions intended to establish the respondent's emotions, attitudes, beliefs, knowledge and behavior relative to global warming's causes and consequences. For example, respective open-ended questions asked alternatively if, how, and for whom global warming was a problem; how global warming is caused; if and how global warming can be stopped or limited; and what, if anything, an individual could do to help limit global warming.
Toward the end of the interview, respondents were asked to read "a brief essay about global warming" see Appendix 1 , which was designed to frame climate change as a human health issue. Respondents were also given a green and a pink highlighting pen and asked to "use the green highlighter pen to mark any portions of the essay that you feel are especially clear or helpful, and use the pink highlighter pen to mark any portions of the essay that are particularly confusing or unhelpful.
When respondents finished the reading, they were asked to describe in an open-ended format their "general reaction to this essay. For each portion of the essay they marked in green, they were subsequently asked: "What about each of these sentences was especially clear or helpful to you? Based on this review, we iteratively developed eight thematic categories that captured the range of statements made by respondents.
Bolman and Deal's Four-Frame Model
Table 2 defines and describe these themes. Two graduate student coders were then trained to code each statement into one of the thematic categories. The coders were also instructed to assess the overall valence of each respondent's statements - the first of our dependent measures - rating them as: -1 entirely negative comments ; 0 mixed, including both positive and negative comments ; or 1 entirely positive comments. Following standard content analysis procedures, we tested inter-coder agreement on approximately 50 statements, making sure that a full range of possible types of coding decisions were required of the coders.
To assess reliability, we used Krippendorff's alpha [ 24 , 25 ], a conservative measure that corrects for chance agreement among coders; a K-alpha of. For 7 of the 8 thematic categories, we achieved a reliability of.
pierreducalvet.ca/225832.php After establishing reliability, the two coders then went on to categorize the rest of the remaining statements from the sample of respondents. Composite scores were created for each of the four sections of the essay - the opening, the threat section, the benefit section, and the conclusion - by summing the sentence-specific scores in the section and dividing by the number of sentences. A composite score for the entire essay - the second of the dependent measures in our hypothesis - was created by summing the sentence scores across each segment and dividing by the number of respondents per segment.
Population estimates, which can be taken solely as preliminary indicators given the non-probabilistic nature of our sampling, were estimated by weighting the mean values for each of the six segments according to its prevalence in the U. To test the between-segment differences in our dependent measures - overall reactions to the essay i.
To test if the median response to the essay on each dependent measure was greater than zero i.
- essay on energy independence;
- Reframing, Bolman and Deal Essay - Words | Bartleby.
- cohabitation vs marriage essays!
Lastly, for both dependent measures, we used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to test our hypothesis that five of the six segments the Dismissive being the one exception would respond positively to the essay; the null hypothesis was that the median score for each of the five segments did not differ from zero. The Wilcoxon signed rank test is appropriate for small sample sizes and non-normal distributions, both of which are the case for at least some segments in our data.
Average valence of respondents' general essay comments. The mean valence of respondent comments when asked their general reactions to the public health essay by audience segment and by a national population estimate. Composite essay scores by segment. Scores reflect respondent average values by segment for the difference between the number of times each of 18 sentences were marked "especially clear or helpful" and "especially confusing or unhelpful" with a full range of possible values between 18 and Post-hoc - after examining the visualized data see Figures 4 , 5 and 6 - we decided to test for two possible main effects in the data.
To examine the possibility that the essay's later focus on the public health benefits of mitigation-related policy actions was seen by respondents as clearer and more useful than the essay's earlier focus on public health-related threats, we calculated the difference between the re-scaled by a factor of 10 average response to both the benefit and the threat sections and then used the Wilcoxon signed rank test to test, by segment, whether the median of these differences was greater than zero.
We then evaluated the overall main effect of the essay - across all segments - using the weighted t-test on the differences with weights corresponding to the frequencies of the segments in the population. Essay evaluations by sentence: Alarmed, Concerned and Cautious segments. Sentence-specific evaluations of the public health essay by respondents in the Alarmed, Concerned and Cautious segments and by a national population estimate.
The national population estimate was created by weighting the values for each of the six segments according to their relative proportion of American adults. Essay evaluations by sentence: Disengaged, Doubtful and Dismissive segments. Sentence-specific evaluations of the public health essay by respondents in the Disengaged, Doubtful and Dismissive segments and by a national population estimate. Essay evaluations by section opening, threat, benefits, closing. Average section-specific evaluations of the public health essay by respondents in each of the six audience segments and by a national population estimate.
Note: Scores reflect the difference between the number of sentences within each section marked by a respondent as "especially clear or helpful" and those marked as "especially confusing or unhelpful" with those values averaged across the number of sentences per section and rescaled by a factor of The national population estimate was created by weighting the mean values for each of the six segments according to their relative proportion of American adults.
Therefore, results obtained in this analysis may be biased and void of actual situation in the work environment. Different work environments require different motivational factors. For instance, technical work environment is inclined towards following strict safety rules. On the other hand, social work environment is flexible to different conditions. In order to build an ideal work environment, organization structuring should be inclined towards inclusion of managerial perspective since this organ monitors progress of the working group Bolman and Deal, Specifically, a good working environment should be flexible, relevant, and comfortable within set measurement standards that support intrinsic and extrinsic relationship environment has on the performance of employees.
Critique of the article
However, these measures should be specific to a work environment, skills of employees, and goals of an organization. Besides, it is important to consider the size of an organization and the nature of its duties. Conclusively, the first two chapters of the book Reframing Organizations capture various issues of environmental impact on the performance of employees and managers in organizations.
However, it is not specific on a time frame. Besides, the two chapters are silent on unique aspects of environmental influence on performance in place of work. However, the authors have succeeded in separating different elements that make organizations different, despite applying same management strategies. The situation is even complex in highly stratified organizations. Bolman, Lee and T. This essay on Critique: Reframing organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership was written and submitted by user Linda Robbins to help you with your own studies.
You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly.